Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Dyer v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv01802
Plaintiff: Todd A. Dyer
Defendant: United States of America, Federal Correctional Institution Elkton, Warden Mark Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyson v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01999
Petitioner: Andre Tyson
Respondent: Warden Mark Williams and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Letner v. Williams
as 4:2022cv00404
Petitioner: David C. Letner
Respondent: Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollard v. Williams
as 4:2021cv00702
Petitioner: Robert Pollard
Respondent: Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harden v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00247
Respondent: Michael Carvajal and Warden Mark Williams
Petitioner: Alexander Harden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Connolly v. Williams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00050
Petitioner: Rory Connolly
Respondent: Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ferguson v. Williams
as 4:2020cv02672
Petitioner: Bobby Ferguson
Respondent: Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harden v. Williams et al
as 4:2020cv02338
Respondent: Michael Carvajal and Warden Mark Williams
Petitioner: Alexander Harden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mighty v. Williams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv02188
Petitioner: Edward A. Mighty
Respondent: Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv02547
Respondent: Michael Carvajal and Warden Mark Williams
Petitioner: Carlin Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?