Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Land v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00499
Petitioner:
Maurice C. Land
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Andre Walker
Defendant:
Warden Robert May and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Detlef Hartmann v. Shane Troxler, et al
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DETLEF F. HARTMANN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANE TROXLER, DOC, BC, OP, WARDEN ROBERT MAY and STATE OF DELAWARE
Coleman v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00207
Petitioner:
Darcell Coleman
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and Kathy Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jarvis v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Jarvis
Defendant:
Warden Robert May, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis, Captain Bruce Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz-Webster v. May et al
as 1:2021cv01679
Petitioner:
Maurice Cruz-Webster
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shivers Jr. v. May et al
as 1:2021cv01502
Petitioner:
Dwight L. Shivers Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Manuel v. May et al
as 1:2021cv01439
Petitioner:
Karl B. Manuel
Respondent:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Attorney General for the State of Delaware, Warden Robert May and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foreman v. May et al
as 1:2021cv00957
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Petitioner:
David D Foreman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. May et al
as 1:2021cv00819
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Petitioner:
John D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
