Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Randall Hutchison
as 23-3558
Petitioner:
In re: RANDALL TYLER HUTCHISON
Respondent:
KIM HENDERSON, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: William Dixon
as 21-3469
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM R. DIXON
Respondent:
WARDEN, TOLEDO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
In re: Christopher Foster
as 20-4210
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER FOSTER
Respondent:
WARDEN, TOLEDO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Christopher Smith v. Warden, Toledo Corr. Inst.
as 20-3496
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, TOLEDO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Christopher Smith v. Warden, Toledo Corr. Inst.
as 20-3472
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Respondent:
WARDEN, TOLEDO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Warren K. Henness, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 19-3064
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio, UNKNOWN PHARMACIES, CHRISTOPHER LAROSE and others
Other:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN K. HENNESS
In re: Vincent Griffin
as 17-3536
Movant:
In re: VINCENT R. GRIFFIN
Respondent:
WARDEN, TOLEDO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
In re: Daryl BoCook
as 17-3390
Movant:
In re: DARYL D. BOCOOK
Respondent:
WARDEN, TOLEDO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
In re: Tony Gro
as 15-4071
Movant:
In re: TONY R. GROSS
Respondent:
WARDEN TOLEDO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
