Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jeffrey Burgess v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-17013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY ALAN BURGESS
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor, NASH, C.E.O Medical at Avenal State Prison, BAILEY, Associate Warden at Avenal State Prison and others
Jeffrey Wren v. Rosemary Ndoh
as 20-16571
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY CHARLES WREN
Respondent / Appellee:
ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden of Avenal State Prison
(HC) Wren v. Avenal State Prison
as 1:2019cv01603
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Charles Wren
Respondent:
Warden of Avenal State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Watson v. Rosemary Ndoh, et al
as 18-15607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden at Avenal State Prison, M. KIRCHER, Associate Warden at Avenal State Prison, L. WOOD, Lt., Avenal State Prison and others
Flores v. Warden for Avenal State Prison
as 4:2016cv00496
Petitioner:
Angel Flores
Respondent:
Warden for Avenal State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McClure v. Villegas et al
as 1:2013cv01960
Plaintiff:
Lawrence F. McClure
Defendant:
A. Villegas and Warden at Avenal State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hershel Mitchell v. Matthew Cates, et al
as 13-17401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERSHEL C. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATES, Secretary - California Department of Corrections, J. D. HARTLEY, Warden at Avenal State Prison, R. BOCCELLA, Correctional Captain at Avenal State Prison and others
Carl Love v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-15133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL R. LOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director, Secretary of CDCR, S. R. MORE, Warden at DVI Reception Center, R. VELLA, Capt. at CSP Corcoran and others
Lionel Tate, Sr. v. James Hartley
as 11-16260
Petitioner - Appellant:
LIONEL TATE, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden at Avenal State Prison
Clyde McKinney, Sr. v. Dir. of CDCR et al
as 2:2010cv00735
Defendant:
Dir. of CDCR, Nurse Rose, Nurse Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde McKinney, Sr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.