Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Washington v. May et al
as 1:2022cv01299
Petitioner:
Corey D. Washington
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans et al v. DOC Commissions et al
as 1:2020cv01663
Plaintiff:
Kwai Tilghman, Dayquan Hargroves, Jamar Robbins and others
Defendant:
Governor John Carney, All Wardens of the State of Delaware's Penitentaries and DOC Commissions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daisey v. Dr. Garner et al
as 1:2018cv01708
Defendant:
Dr. Delbert Kwan, Dr. Garner, Officer Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Daisey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Richman et al
as 1:2018cv01605
Defendant:
Warden Pierce, Ms. Rodgers, Warden Metzger and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon D. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Metzger et al
as 1:2017cv01274
Petitioner:
Tyrone Washington
Respondent:
Dana Metzger and Matt Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00601
Petitioner:
Michael T. Washington
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Petitioner:
LeShawn Washington
Respondent:
David Pierce and Matt Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Warden Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv01088
Petitioner:
LeShawn Washington
Respondent:
Warden Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cruz v. Samasundaram et al
as 1:2012cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Cruz
Defendant:
Samasundaram, C/O Nannett Bordley, Tina Roy-Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00191
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Washington, Territory of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
