Cases 41 - 47 of 47
The George Washington University v. Does et al
as 1:2007cv00555
Plaintiff:
The George Washington University
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does and ABC Companies
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
CUS4, INC. et al v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
as 1:2007cv00841
Plaintiff:
CUS4, INC. and FEDERAL NATIONAL COMMERCIAL, INC.
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
NLRB v. George WA Univ
as 06-1051
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
George Washington University
George WA Univ v. NLRB
as 06-1012
Petitioner:
George Washington University
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor:
Service Employees International Union, CLC, Local 500
George WA Univ v. DC, et al
as 02-7055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
George Washington University, a Federally Chartered University
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation, DC Board of Zoning Adjustment, Anthony A. Williams, as Mayor of the District of Columbia and others
Terminated Party:
American Council on Education, National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities, Consortium of Universities of the Washington Metropolitan Area and others
Ostrzenski, Adam v. Col Hosp Wmn Fdn Inc, et al
as 97-7163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adam Ostrzenski
Defendant - Appellee:
Columbia Hospital for Women Foundation, Inc., George Washington University, Holy Cross Hospital and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Adventist Healthcare Mid-Atlantic Corporation
Intervenor For Defendant:
Premier Ambulatory System, Inc.
EL-AMIN, et al v. GWU, et al
as 1:1995cv02000
Plaintiff:
SHEILA EL-AMIN , JOYCE B. LASLEY , KATHERINE LINDEN and others
Defendant:
THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HELEN J.A. COTTRELL
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
