Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Teamsters Health Service and Insurance Plan Local 404 v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 1:2017cv12342
Plaintiff: Teamsters Health Service and Insurance Plan Local 404
Defendant: PURDUE PHARMA, LP, PURDUE PHARMA, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Teamsters Health Service and Insurance Plan Local 404 v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 3:2017cv12342
Plaintiff: Teamsters Health Service and Insurance Plan Local 404
Defendant: Purdue Pharma, LP, Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 1:2012mc91238
Plaintiff: Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sandoz Inc.
Defendant: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., International Medication Systems, Ltd., Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Respondent: Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC and Winthrop U.S.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Toland v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11108
Plaintiff: Kathleen Toland
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. , Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv11681
Plaintiff: Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sandoz Inc.
Defendant: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , International Medication Systems, Ltd. , Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Citizens for Consume, et al v. Abbott Laboratories,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2001cv12257
Plaintiff: Citizens for Consumer Justice , Colorado Progressive Coalition , Congress of California Seniors and others
Defendant: Allergan Worldwide , Astrazeneca US , Bayer, AG and others
Consolidated_plaintiff: Shirley Geller , United Food & Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midest Health Benefits Fund , Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia and others
Consolidated_defendant: Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. , Fujisawa Pharmaceut, Monsanto CO. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff: Roberta S. Starks , Kimberly K. Hoover , National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund and others
Amicu: Secretary of Health and Human Services
Intervenor: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Intervenor_defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY a/k/a BRISTOL-MYERS ONCOLOGY DIVISION/HIV PRODUCTS , GENSIA SICOR, INC., Novartis AG and others
Movant: Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield , Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization, Inc., Neighborhood Health Plan, Inc. and others
Adr_provider: Eric Green and Jonathan Marks
Respondent: Luis E. Cobo
Objector: Patricia Weatherly and James W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VEN-A-C-ARE v. Actavis Mid Atlantic, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv10852
Plaintiff: VEN-A-C-ARE of the Florida Keys, Inc.
Defendant: Actavis Mid Atlantic, LLC, Alpharma, Inc., Alpharma USPD, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
In Re: State of Utah Cases
as 1:2008cv10575
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of Utah, State of Utah and others
Defendant: Actvis, US, Actvis, US, Actvis, US and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes Both
In Re: State of Iowa Cases
as 1:2007cv12141
Plaintiff: State of Iowa, State of Iowa, State of Iowa and others
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alpharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract Plaintiff
The County of Orange v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10879
Plaintiff: The County of Orange, The County of Orange and The County of Orange
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?