Cases 1 - 10 of 489
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Watson Realty Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J. Arko and Andrew M. Moore
Defendant:
Watson Realty Corp., Premiere Plus Realty Co., Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Rosa et al v. Brightline, Inc.
as 1:2024cv20611
Plaintiff:
Terrance Rosa, Ryan Watson, Donisha Jackson and others
Defendant:
Brightline, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jefferson WatsonIn re: Jefferson Watson
as 23-13818
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFERSON WATSON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Watson v. Rocket Mortgage LLC
as 3:2023mi00001
Plaintiff:
Harvey Watson
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Darnell Watson
as 23-10655
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARNELL WATSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Howell-Fedorov et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 9:2023cv80095
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell-Fedorov and Damon Fedorov-Howell-Karriem
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Law Office of Marshall C. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: William Watson, Jr.
as 22-14250
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM WORTH WATSON, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, FIRST DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, JAY MARKAR and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
