Cases 21 - 30 of 3,112
Wilkes v. Watson
as 5:2023cv01773
Petitioner:
Joseph Wilkes
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desjarlais v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2023op45008
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Desjarlais
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lask v. Watson
as 3:2023cv01381
Petitioner:
Richard Lask
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demming v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2023op45007
Plaintiff:
Shoneteal Demming
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Watson et al v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01948
Plaintiff:
John Watson and Margaret Watson
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. Watson
as 3:2023cv00861
Petitioner:
James M. Howard
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prokop v. Abbott Laboratories Inc. et al
as 1:2023op45005
Plaintiff:
Nancy Prokop
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc., AbbVie Inc., Cardinal Health Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Heyward v. Dinkins et al
as 3:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
L. M. Heyward
Defendant:
Veronica Dinkins, K. Plank, R Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bowen v. Watson
as 5:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Robert Bowen
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Troy Watson and Anitra Watson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
