Cases 31 - 40 of 3,112
Martinez v. Watson
as 3:2022cv02227
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez and Nicholas Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Ohio v. Watson
as 1:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio
Defendant:
Michael Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
State of Ohio v. Watson
as 1:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio
Defendant:
Michael Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brundage v. Watson
as 5:2022cv02086
Petitioner:
Scott Brundage
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv02067
Plaintiff:
Darren C Watson and Darren C. Watson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Wright v. Watson
as 2:2022cv04042
Plaintiff:
Ramone Wright
Defendant:
Michael H Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03876
Plaintiff:
Tracy Watson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Palmer v. Watson
as 4:2022cv01958
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Palmer
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheldon v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Sheldon and Derrick Sheldon
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp., fnu Shenafield, fnu Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Susanville Elementary School District et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45031
Plaintiff:
Susanville Elementary School District and Lassen County Office of Education
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
