Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Webb v. Gavin et al
as 1:2015cv00221
Petitioner:
Bradley W. Webb
Respondent:
Wayne J. Gavin and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEWMAN v. GAVIN et al
as 2:2015cv00213
Petitioner:
HARRIS NEWMAN
Respondent:
WAYNE J. GAVIN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEWMAN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00169
Petitioner:
HARRIS NEWMAN
Respondent:
WAYNE J. GAVIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Gavin et al
as 1:2014cv02231
Petitioner:
Kevin Wright
Respondent:
Wayne J. Gavin and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHALOEUNPORN v. GAVIN et al
as 2:2014cv05473
Petitioner:
DAVID CHALOEUNPORN
Respondent:
WAYNE J. GAVIN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF __________ and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cessna v. Lewis et al
as 3:2014cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Cessna
Defendant:
Robin M. Lewis, Wayne J. Gavin, Ronda Ellett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Gavin et al
as 1:2014cv00269
Petitioner:
David Robinson
Respondent:
Wayne J. Gavin , Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole , Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alex v. Gavin et al
as 1:2014cv00261
Petitioner:
Anthony Joseph Alex
Respondent:
Wayne J. Gavin, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. GAVIN et al
as 2:2014cv00804
Petitioner:
ANTONIO JONES
Respondent:
WAYNE J. GAVIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WIGGINS v. GAVIN
as 2:2013cv07504
Petitioner:
DWAYNE S. WIGGINS
Respondent:
WAYNE J. GAVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
