Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sociedad Concesionaria Metropolitana de Salud S.A. v. Webuild S.P.A
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Sociedad Concesionaria Metropolitana de Salud S.A.
Defendant:
Webuild S.P.A
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 207 Confirm Arbitral Award
In Re: Application of Webuild S.p.A. and Sacyr S.A
as 23-73
Plaintiff:
Sacyr S.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Webuild S.p.A.
Appellee:
WSP USA Inc. and Republic of Panama
Grupo Unidos por el Canal, S.A., et al v. Autoridad del Canal de Panama
as 21-14408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRUPO UNIDOS POR EL CANAL, S.A., SACYR, S.A., WEBUILD, S.P.A. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AUTORIDAD DEL CANAL DE PANAMA
WEBUILD S.P.A. v. ARGENTINE REPUBLIC
as 1:2021cv02464
Plaintiff:
WEBUILD S.P.A., f/k/a IMPREGILO S.P.A., WEBUILD S.P.A., and IMPREGILO S.P.A.
Defendant:
ARGENTINE REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Grupo Unidos por el Canal, S.A. et al v. Autoridad Del Canal De Panama
as 1:2021cv21509
Plaintiff:
Webuild, S.p.A., Sacyr, S.A., Jan De Nul, N.V. and others
Defendant:
Autoridad Del Canal De Panama
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
The Lane Construction Corporation v. Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00164
Counter Defendant:
The Lane Construction Corporation, Salini Impregilo S.P.A., WeBuild S.P.A. Inc. and others
Defendant:
Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc. and Skanska Infrastructure Development, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Granite Construction Company
Cross Claimant:
Skanska-Granite-Lane, A Joint Venture
Not Classified By Court:
Skanska USA Civil, Inc. and Skanska USA, Inc.
Petitioner:
I-4 Mobility Partners OPCO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Grupo Unidos Por El del Canal, S.A. et al v. Autoridad del Canal de Panama
as 1:2020cv24867
Plaintiff:
Webuild, S.p.A., Sacyr, S.A., Jan De Nul, N.V. and others
Defendant:
Autoridad del Canal de Panama
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
