Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Shoman Kasbekar, et al v. Ivy Station Community Assoc., et al
as 20-13614
Defendant / Appellee:
WEISSMAN, P.C., JASON LOMONACO and IVY STATION COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSHAMA S. KASBEKAR, SHEKHAR M. KASBEKAR and SHOMAN KASBEKAR
Shoman Kasbekar, et al v. Ivy Station Community Assoc., et al
as 20-10620
Defendant / Appellee:
WEISSMAN, P.C., JASON LOMONACO and IVY STATION COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSHAMA S. KASBEKAR, SHEKHAR M. KASBEKAR and SHOMAN KASBEKAR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rhinehart et al v. Option One Mortgage Corp et al
as 4:2019cv00226
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, SASCO Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates and others
Plaintiff:
Wanda Jean Rhinehart and Ricky Lee Rhinehart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kasbekar et al v. Ivy Station Community Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05928
Defendant:
Weissman, P.C., Jason LoMonaco and Ivy Station Community Association, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shoman Kasbekar, Sushama S. Kasbekar and Shekhar M. Kasbekar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Minnifield v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 1:2017cv04458
Plaintiff:
Kimelyn A. Minnifield
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Argent Mortgage Company, LLC, Weissman, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hollins et al v. Shearer et al
as 3:2012cv00172
Plaintiff:
John J. Hollins, Jr. and Hollins, Raybin & Weissman, P.C.
Defendant:
George H. Shearer, Amber G. (Shearer) McAdams and Internal Revenue Service
Counter_defendant:
John J. Hollins, Jr. and Hollins, Raybin & Weissman, P.C.
Counter_plaintiff:
Amber G. (Shearer) McAdams
Cross_plaintiff:
Amber G. (Shearer) McAdams
Cross_defendant:
George H. Shearer and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
