Cases 61 - 70 of 153
Hancock v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 8:2017cv01814
Petitioner:
Adriana Avila, Nyle Davis, Duane Fosdick and others
Respondent:
National General Insurance Company, Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Interested Party:
Gregory Smith
Keith Preston v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 8:2017cv01815
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hietberg, Keith Preston and Bryan Tidwell
Defendant:
National General Insurance Company, Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Gene Conklin v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 8:2017cv01822
Petitioner:
Gene Conklin
Respondent:
National General Insurance Company, Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., d/b/a Wells Fargo Dealer Services
Havard et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 8:2017cv01818
Petitioner:
Joe Buckingham, Regina Gonzalez-Phillips, Dustin Havard and others
Respondent:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Munz v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 1:2017cv01378
Plaintiff:
Timothy Munz
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Munz v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 1:2017at00773
Plaintiff:
Timothy Munz
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Waterman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv07194
Interested Party:
Bershire Hathaway Inc
Plaintiff:
Frank L Waterman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Waterman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv07192
Interested Party:
Bershire Hathaway Inc
Plaintiff:
Frank L Waterman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Fosdick v. Wells Fargo Company et al
as 3:2017cv05111
Plaintiff:
Duane Fosdick
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Company, Well Fargo Bank, N.A. and National General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv04995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
