Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Meredith V Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00791
Defendant:
Meredith V Johnson and Sandra J Johnson
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Cynthia M Seput
as 2:2012cv00047
Defendant:
Cynthia M Seput
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. David Whitmer et al
as 2:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant:
David Whitmer, Sr and Patricia Whitmer
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Elia Tawil
as 2:2011cv10777
Defendant:
Elia Tawil
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 3:2011cv05533
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Smith
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA , Wells Fargo Home Mortgage , Eagle Home Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Guingona v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 4:2010cv03355
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Guingona
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and First American Trustee Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Guingona v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 3:2010cv03355
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Guingona
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and First American Trustee Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Curiel et al
as 2:2009at01761
Plaintiff:
Pedro Curiel and Maria Curiel
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. DBA HomeQ Servicing, Argent Mortgage Company, LLC, Old Republic Default Management Services and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Curiel et al vs Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv03074
Plaintiff:
Pedro Curiel and Maria Curiel
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., Argent Mortgage Company, LLC, Old Republic Default Management Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
O'Hearn et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 5:2009cv04762
Plaintiff:
Kenneth O'Hearn and Summer O'Hearn
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, The Honte Group Inc. and Eric O. Nelson, III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
