Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thompson v. Perez et al
as 1:2009cv03601
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Prison Health Services Inc, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Larson et al
as 1:2007cv07233
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Judge Larson, Judge Fabian, Sgt. Desjardine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Perez et al
as 1:2007cv06565
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Trabula and Sgt. Smith
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Perez et al
as 1:2007cv07234
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick Perez, John A Barsanti and Joseph Lulves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Chrissy et al
as 1:2007cv06209
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Chrissy and Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Perez et al
as 1:2007cv06564
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Lt Carter, John Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 1:2007cv06563
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Perez et al
as 1:2007cv04970
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Midland Management Co.
as 1:2007cv05222
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Midland Management Co. and Kim L. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Perez et al
as 1:2007cv04698
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez and John A Barsanti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
