Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv02188
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Sean Simmons, Gravador Charlotte and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Moose International Inc. v. Chen et al
as 1:2016cv11618
Plaintiff:
Moose International Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", lulu chen, Zhou RunFa and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Wendling v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv09342
Plaintiff:
Dianne Wendling
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Wendling v. Veros Partners Inc et al
as 2:2015mc02002
Plaintiff:
William E Wendling, Jr
Defendant:
Veros Partners Inc, Matthew D Haab, Jeffrey B Risinger and others
Miscellaneous_party:
PIN Financial LLC
Murphy v. CIGPF I Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv03007
Plaintiff:
Wendle Murphy
Defendant:
CIGPF I Corp. , American Coradius International, LLC and Client Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wells et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv10658
Plaintiff:
Chanda Wells and Wendle Lewis
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Title 11 Funding of California, Inc.
as 1:2009cv06156
Plaintiff:
Wendle Murphy and Wendle Murphy
Defendant:
Title 11 Funding of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harris v. Officer Hall et al
as 1:2008cv07255
Plaintiff:
Quincy A. Harris
Defendant:
Will County State's Attorney, James W Glasgow , Debra J. Wendling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
