Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MORES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00122
Petitioner:
WENDY MORES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Harris v. McDonough
as 24-1279
Claimant:
WENDY HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023vv01631
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
HIGHTOWER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01571
Petitioner:
WENDY HIGHTOWER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
King v. McDonough
as 23-2291
Claimant:
WENDY KING
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Perry v. PTO
as 23-1812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. PERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, WENDY GARBER, Director Patent Technology Center, DARNELL JAYNE, Director and others
HUBBARD v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00440
Petitioner:
WENDY HUBBARD
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
NEWTON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00271
Petitioner:
WENDY NEWTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
DOUGHERTY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01252
Petitioner:
WENDY DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TRUCH v. USA
as 1:2022cv01227
Plaintiff:
WENDY TRUCH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
