Cases 1 - 10 of 11
A.D.A. v. McKinsey & Company, Incorporated United States
as 22-1219
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A.D.A., As Next Friend of L.R.A., a minor child under the age of 18
Defendant / Appellant:
MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INCORPORATED UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INCORPORATED, NORAMCO and others
Thomas Figaniak v. Tyler Johnson
as 17-2333
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS G. FIGANIAK and VALERIE A. FIGANIAK, as Administrators of the Estate of Kevin Figaniak
Defendant - Appellant:
TYLER JOHNSON, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG TYLER PEACOCK, individually and JARRETT CHANDLER, individually
Defendant:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF OWL'S HOME NEST, LOYAL ORDER OF OWLS NEST LODGE 2558, d/b/a The Owls Nest, a West Virginia corporation and YE OLDE ALPHA, INC., a West Virginia corporation
Tina Lymer v. The City of Clarksburg
as 17-1452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TINA M. LYMER and WILLIAM J. LYMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSBURG, a West Virginia Municipal Corporation
Carl Washington, Jr. v. National Reconnaissance Office
as 16-1785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL THURSTON WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE (NRO), FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BERKELEY COUNTY, WV and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES (DCJS), UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Wayne Patterson v. R. Yeager
as 16-1350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE E. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT R. T. YEAGER, individually and in his official capacity, South Charleston Police, JOHN DOES 1-7, seven unknown, individually and in their official capacities, MAGISTRATE JULIE YEAGER and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SOUTH CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA, a municipal corporation, OFFICER T. A. BAILES, individually and in his official capacity, South Charleston Police and OFFICER A R. LINDELL, individually and in his official capacity, South Charleston Police
Wayne Patterson v. R. Yeager
as 16-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE E. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT R. T. YEAGER, individually and in his official capacity, South Charleston Police, JOHN DOES 1-7, seven unknown, individually and in their official capacities, MAGISTRATE JULIE YEAGER and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SOUTH CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA, a municipal corporation, OFFICER T. A. BAILES, individually and in his official capacity, South Charleston Police and OFFICER A R. LINDELL, individually and in his official capacity, South Charleston Police
Tina Grace v. C. Michael Spark
as 15-2536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TINA M. GRACE and LARRY GRACE
Defendant - Appellee:
C. MICHAEL SPARKS, MICHAEL THORNSBURY, JAY LOCKARD, individually and in their (former) official capacity and others
Beverly Gray v. Hawkeye Contracting Co
as 12-1726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEVERLY S. GRAY, an individual, and as ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF Mark A. Gray
Defendant - Appellee:
CATENARY COAL COMPANY, LLC, a West Virginia Corporation, APPALACHIAN SECURITY, INC., a Kentucky Corporation and HAWKEYE CONTRACTING COMPANY, LLC
Kathy McCornack v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 11-2350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHY MCCORNACK, an individual, DANIEL E. MCCORNACK, JR., an individual and R.J.M, a minor child by his mother and next friend Kathy McCornack
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTAVIS TOTOWA, LLC, a New Jersey corporation, ACTAVIS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC, a Delaware corporation and others
Kathy McCornack v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 11-2326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHY MCCORNACK, an individual, DANIEL E. MCCORNACK, JR., an individual and R.J.M, a minor child by his mother and next friend Kathy McCornack
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTAVIS TOTOWA, LLC, a New Jersey corporation, ACTAVIS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC, a Delaware corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
