Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
WHITTEN v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv90279
Plaintiff: JAMES WHITTEN
Defendant: A.P. GREENE INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
WHITTEN v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv86583
Plaintiff: JAMES WHITTEN
Defendant: U.S. RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Morris et al v. Kesselring et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01739
Plaintiff: David Lee Morris, Pamela Morris and Randy Morris
Defendant: Ronald Kesselring, Robert Kesselring, Zumbrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITTEN v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv74896
Petitioner: JAMES A. WHITTEN
Defendant: CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
WHITTEN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv80116
Plaintiff: JOLYNN H. WHITTEN
Defendant: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
WHITTEN, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76651
Plaintiff: JAMES AUSTIN WHITTEN, JR
Defendant: 3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
WHITTEN v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73701
Plaintiff: JOHN M. WHITTEN, JOHN M. WHITTEN, JOHN M. WHITTEN and others
Defendant: A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant: ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?