Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wightman v. Genworth Life Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv03293
Plaintiff:
Marlen Wightman
Defendant:
Genworth Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jeremy Wightman v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv08933
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wightman
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Employment Company, LLC and Does 1 to 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wightman v. Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01784
Plaintiff:
William Wightman
Defendant:
Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions, Inc., Does 1-100, inclusive and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm
Anne Wightman v. Beanfields PBC
as 2:2020cv10731
Defendant:
Beanfields PBC
Plaintiff:
Anne Wightman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin v. State of California, San Francisco Superior Court et al
as 3:2020cv00900
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Austin
Defendant:
Med. Appeals Analyst D. Flores, M. Begert, A. Massulo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Austin v. State of California, San Francisco Superior Court et al
as 1:2020cv00180
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Austin
Defendant:
M. Begert, D. Flores, A. Massulo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Safapou v. Marin County of California et al
as 3:2017cv07042
Plaintiff:
Cherie Safapou
Defendant:
Marin County of California, Marin County Child Protective Services, Mosy Doroodian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandes v. Wightman et al
as 3:2014cv00364
Plaintiff:
Michael Fernandes
Defendant:
Kay Wightman and Claudia Nemir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
