Cases 21 - 30 of 543
Dalton, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Plaintiff:
GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner:
GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Oregon Wild, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-35579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OREGON WILD, an Oregon nonprofit corporation and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, MICHAEL RAMSEY, in his official capacity as Lakeview Ranger District Ranger, JEANNETTE WILSON, in her official capacity as Silver Lake Ranger District Ranger and others
Montana Environmental Information Center et al v. Montana Department of Environmental Quality et al
as 4:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Montana Environmental Information Center, Sierra Club, Wildearth Guardians and others
Defendant:
Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Christopher Dorrington and Dan Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
WildEarth Guardians v. Environmental Protection Agency
as 1:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-35352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING and IDAHO FISH AND GAME COMMISSION
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and FRIENDS OF THE EARTH
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Kurtis Steele, et al
as 23-35125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, SWAN VIEW COALITION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KURTIS E. STEELE, in his capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Flathead National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MONTANA LOGGING ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Citizens Caring for the Future et al v. Haaland et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Citizens Caring for the Future, New Mexico Interfaith Power and Light, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
Secretary of the Int Debra Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, Deb Haaland and others
Not Classified By Court:
United States Attorney's Office for the District of New Mexico and United States Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wildearth Guardians et al v. Bucknall et al
as 9:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Wildearth Guardians, Western Watersheds Project and Trap Free Montana
Defendant:
Janet Bucknall, Dalin Tidwell, United States Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WildEarth Guardians v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Bureau of Reclamation and Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
