Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Stock et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 2:2016cv02795
Plaintiff:
Gene Stock , Arthur S. Nichols, Jr. , Jay Nichols and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bishop, et al v. Smith, et al
as 14-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAY E. PHILLIPS and SUSAN G. BARTON
Plaintiff:
MARY BISHOP and SHARON BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLY HOWE SMITH, in her official capacity as Court Clerk for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America
Defendant-Intervenor:
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, THAD BALKMAN and OKLAHOMAN'S FOR PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
Bishop, et al v. Smith, et al
as 14-5003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHARON BALDWIN, MARY BISHOP, GAY E. PHILLIPS, individuals and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SALLY HOWE SMITH, in her official capacity as Court Clerk for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America
Defendant-Intervenor:
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, THAD BALKMAN and OKLAHOMAN'S FOR PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bishop, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 06-5188
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY BISHOP, SHARON BALDWIN, SUSAN G. BARTON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
OKLAHOMA, STATE OF, ex rel., Drew Edmondson in his official capacity as Attorney General and Brad Henry in his official capacity as Governor
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., John Ashcroft in his official capacity as Attorney General and George W. Bush in his official capacity as President
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
