Cases 1 - 10 of 19
USA v. Ferrell
as 22-40812
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Carl Ferrell, M.D.
USA v. Williams
as 22-60254
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Trenton Ferrell Williams
Wayne FerrellIn re: Wayne Ferrell
as 22-60083
Petitioner:
In re: Wayne E. Ferrell, Jr.
Respondent:
Gregory Cole, William M. Cole, Robert Cole and others
Ferrell v. Lumpkin
as 21-51003
Petitioner / Appellant:
Damian Ferrell
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Donnie Ferrell
as 19-10995
Defendant / Appellant:
DONNIE ARLONDO FERRELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Wiswell v. Harris County, et al
as 19-20090
Defendant / Appellee:
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS LAW LIBRARY, JOHN DOE, Number Two, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM CYPRESS DAVID SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WISWELL
USA v. Christopher Ferrell
as 17-41280
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WADE FERRELL
Kevin Lampkin, et al v. UBS Painewebber, Inc., et al
as 17-20608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LAMPKIN, STEPHEN MILLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOE BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, formerly known as UBS Painewebber, Incorporated and UBS SECURITIES, L.L.C., formerly known as UBS Warburg, L.L.C.
Jimmy Cummings v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20215
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY FERRELL CUMMINGS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ray Ferrell v. Leonard Papania, et al
as 15-60755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAY A. FERRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LEONARD PAPANIA, Chief of City of Gulfport and L.R. WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
