Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Moreno v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01500
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Moreno
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stally v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01498
Plaintiff:
Stally
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01496
Plaintiff:
Darryl Poole
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Sisto, et al.
as 2:2007cv01499
Plaintiff:
Cedrick A. Walker
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolf v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01494
Plaintiff:
Perry Woolf
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01497
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee White
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01495
Plaintiff:
George Harmon
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01351
Plaintiff:
Miguel E Diaz
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogge et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company
as 3:2007cv02873
Plaintiff:
Everett Hogge, Everett Hogge, Everett Hogge and others
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, John Crane, Inc., John Crane, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Montalvo v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau. L.L.C.
as 4:2007cv01885
Plaintiff:
Juan F. Montalvo and Juan F. Montalvo
Defendant:
Mercantile Adjustment Bureau. L.L.C.
Mediator:
Mary McLain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
