Cases 11 - 20 of 982
Carrasco (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00611
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Carrasco
Respondent:
J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barrow (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00613
Petitioner:
Donnell Barrow
Respondent:
J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Czajkowski (PS) v. Bain
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Conrad J. Czajkowski
Defendant:
William Bain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Respondent:
John F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Esparza Rodriguez (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Fernando Esparza Rodriguez
Respondent:
Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bickle (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
Nicholas Bickle
Respondent:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bamesberger (PS) v. Sells
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kent William Alan Bamesberger, Jr. and Kent William Alan Bamesberger
Defendant:
Sells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Hicks et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Tiara Hicks, Debora A. Adams, Andrew C. Brazeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duckery (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
William H. Duckery
Defendant:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prescott (PS) v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Myron Pruitt, Homero Garza, Jeffrn Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
