Cases 11 - 20 of 162
Bounds v. USA
as 3:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Christopher William Bounds
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Faulkner v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00219
Petitioner:
William Faulkner
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frey v. Centurion Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jacob Spencer Frey
Defendant:
Centurion Health, Inc., Centurion of Idaho LLC, Murray Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio, et al.
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrill v. USA
as 4:2023cv00091
Petitioner:
William Argyle Merrill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. USA
as 4:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
Cody Miller Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Belcher v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv00509
Petitioner:
Camron Belcher
Respondent:
Little, Richardson, Pattriccio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belcher v. Eaton et al
as 1:2022cv00469
Petitioner:
Camron Belcher
Respondent:
Dylan A. Eaton, Brad Little, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stinson v. Young, et al.
as 1:2022cv00451
Petitioner:
Daniel Stinson
Respondent:
Dr. Young, Tonja Riedy and William Rogers
Defendant:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Director Atencio, Director Tewalt, Deputy Director Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
