Social Security Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Kaczor v. Saul et al
as 3:2023cv30027
Plaintiff: William R. Kaczor
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration and Social Security Administration - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Pellegrino v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv10303
Plaintiff: Robert William Pellegrino
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv11890
Plaintiff: Kim Williams
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv11890
Plaintiff: Kim Williams
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Whitney v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv40011
Defendant: Mrs. Ruiz, Social Security Administration, Mr. Altamirana and others
Plaintiff: William Whitney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Glacken v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv11443
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: William F. Glacken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv10547
Plaintiff: Kim Williams
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv10547
Plaintiff: Kim Williams
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stewart v. Berryhill et al
as 1:2018cv10232
Plaintiff: William M. Stewart
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv11058
Plaintiff: Sandra R Williams
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?