Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00325
Defendant:
William A. Gittere, P. Hernandez, Underwood and others
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Gitteres et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and William A. Gitteres
Petitioner:
Kelvin Laneil James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Defendant:
William A Gittere, Kenneth L. Williams, Brian Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Howard v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-400
Plaintiff / Appellee:
REGINALD C. HOWARD
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. GITTERE, DAVID DRUMMOND, JESSE COX and others
Defendant:
KERCHEN and MALLINGER
Davis v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-21
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRENCE ALEXANDER DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. GITTERE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
