Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Graham v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2015cv00390
Plaintiff:
Steven Anthony Graham
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, William Bechtold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Polanco-Cabrera v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015cv00388
Plaintiff:
Victor Polanco-Cabrera
Defendant:
United States of America, William Bechtold and FNU Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wadford v. Watts, et al
as 5:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kelly Edward Wadford, Jr.
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, John Doe, William Bechtold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAHAM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01101
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ANTHONY GRAHAM
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM BECHTOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trotter v. Bechtold et al
as 5:2014cv00517
Plaintiff:
Andrew Maurice Trotter
Defendant:
William Bechtold, Florentino J. Morlote, FNU Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelly Wadford, Jr. v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 14-14207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY EDWARD WADFORD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, National Inmate Appeals, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SE Region, WILLIAM BECHTOLD, Coleman-Low and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michel v. Nowicki et al
as 5:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Adelson Michel
Defendant:
Thomas Nowicki, FNU Adams, J. L. Dole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melvin v. Bechtold et al
as 5:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
Thomas Melvin
Defendant:
William Bechtold, Katherine Mulberry and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Bechtold
as 5:2014cv00007
Petitioner:
Franklin L. Williams
Respondent:
William Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
