Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: Sean Hull, et al v. Groupon, Inc., et al
as 13-55128
:
In re: GROUPON MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY FERREIRA, HEATHER KIMEL, BRIAN ZARD and others
Objector - Appellant:
SEAN HULL
Defendant - Appellee:
GROUPON, INC., NORDSTROM INC., FUN TIME, LLC, DBA Wheel Fun Rentals and others
Chris Brown, et al v. Groupon, Inc., et al
as 13-55120
:
In re: GROUPON MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY FERREIRA, HEATHER KIMEL, BRIAN ZARD and others
Objector - Appellant:
CHRIS BROWN and MAGGIE STROHLEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
GROUPON, INC., NORDSTROM INC., FUN TIME, LLC, DBA Wheel Fun Rentals and others
Padraigin Browne, et al v. Groupon, Inc., et al
as 13-55118
:
In re: GROUPON MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY FERREIRA, HEATHER KIMEL, BRIAN ZARD and others
Objector - Appellant:
PADRAIGIN BROWNE
Defendant - Appellee:
GROUPON, INC., NORDSTROM INC., FUN TIME, LLC, DBA Wheel Fun Rentals and others
Andrea Pridham, et al v. Groupon, Inc., et al
as 13-55119
:
In re: GROUPON MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY FERREIRA, HEATHER KIMEL, BRIAN ZARD and others
Objector - Appellant:
ANDREA PRIDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
GROUPON, INC., NORDSTROM INC., FUN TIME, LLC, DBA Wheel Fun Rentals and others
Eidenmuller v. Groupon, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01244
Petitioner:
William Eidenmuller
Respondent:
Groupon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN RE: GROUPON, INC., MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
as 3:2011md02238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ferreira , Heather Kimel , Brian Zard and others
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Nordstom Inc , DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eidenmuller v. Groupon, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00984
Plaintiff:
William Eidenmuller
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
