Cases 71 - 80 of 236
Roberto Durand v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 22-16533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, MARTIN, HANF and others
Justin Edmiston v. Sucido, et al
as 22-16433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN EDMISTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUCIDO, Correctional Officer, JAMES WEILAND, C.E.R.T. "Senior" and WILLIAM GITTERE, added per #7 Screening Order; #8 AC
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
Lt Roman, Lt Davis, Chet Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
F. Dreesen, Morin, Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iske v. H.D.S.P. et al
as 2:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Harlan Iske
Defendant:
H.D.S.P., H.D.S.P. Medical Staff, Sonya Corriton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorge Miranda-Rivas v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15882
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE MIRANDA-RIVAS
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Respondent:
HAROLD WICKHAM
Michael Smith v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15848
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Rafael Reid v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15947
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAFAEL REID
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Roberto Durand v. Nevada, State of, et al
as 22-15561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA, STATE OF, ELY STATE PRISON, EXUM, Dr. and others
Williams v. Scally
as 2:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
Marcell Williams
Defendant:
James Scally, David Drummond, Jerry Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
