Cases 21 - 30 of 234
Cranford v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Keishawn Cranford
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William Gittere, Tashena Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Aramark et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Aramark, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howlett v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Dustin Howlett
Defendant:
William Gittere and Fernandies Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pough v. Gittere
as 3:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barlow v. Rose et al
as 3:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Keith Barlow
Defendant:
S. Rose, C/O Adams, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, Aramark Inc., Raul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banasiak v. Klein et al
as 3:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Joshua N. Banasiak
Defendant:
Deborah Klein, David Drummond, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howlett v. Gittere et al
as 2:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Dustin Howlett
Defendant:
William Gittere and Fernandies Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Mario Espinoza
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Wiliam Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermaine Campbell, Sr. v. William Gittere, et al
as 23-15972
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERMAINE JAMAICA CAMPBELL, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
