Cases 1 - 10 of 26
GRANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02308
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv02112
Defendant:
JAMES A. BAKER and UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. CHENEY et al
as 1:2020cv02113
Defendant:
RICHARD BRUCE CHENEY, STATE OF ILLINOIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv02095
Defendant:
U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, JAMES A. BAKER and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. CHENEY et al
as 1:2020cv02056
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and RICHARD BRUCE CHENEY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv02030
Defendant:
JAMES A. BAKER, STATE OF ILLINOIS and WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv01724
Defendant:
JAMES A. BAKER and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv01725
Defendant:
JAMES A. BAKER, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GRANT v. CHAIRMAN OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL et al
as 1:2020cv01973
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and CHAIRMAN OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR et al
as 1:2020cv01976
Defendant:
NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
