Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lornes v. Arapho Police Department, et al
as 16-1489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE LORNES THE III, AKA William Lee Lornes, AKA William
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAPHO [SIC] POLICE DEPARTMENT/"CORT HOUSE" [SIC], (Jane Doe, Supervisor), DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT/"HEAD-QORTERS" [SIC] and GALARDO
Lornes v. Arapho [sic] Police Dept., et al
as 13-1454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE LORNES THE III, AKA WIlliam Lee Lornes, AKA William
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAPHO [SIC] POLICE DEPARTMENT/"CORT HOUSE" [SIC], (Jane Doe, Supervisor), DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT/"HEAD-QORTERS" [SIC] and GALARDO
Lornes v. Arapho [sic] Police Dept., et al
as 13-1364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE LORNES THE III, AKA WIlliam Lee Lornes, AKA William
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAPHO [SIC] POLICE DEPARTMENT/"CORT HOUSE" [SIC], (Jane Doe, Supervisor), DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT/"HEAD-QORTERS" [SIC] and GALARDO
Lornes the III v. Syborn et al
as 1:2013cv02144
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lornes the III
Defendant:
Kathey Syborn, Aneta, Christina Washborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lornes the III v. Ramaro et al
as 1:2013cv00709
Petitioner:
William Lee Lornes the III
Respondent:
Ramaro, Willison, Sarg Dordee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lornes the III v. Willson et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Petitioner:
William Lee Lornes the III
Respondent:
Willson and Hickenlooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lornes the III v. Arapho Police Department, et al
as 1:2013cv00714
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lornes the III
Defendant:
Galardo, Arapho Police Department and Denver Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lornes the III v. Cook, et al
as 1:2013cv00712
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lornes the III
Defendant:
Galardo, Cook and Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
