Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,980
Bhandari v. Barr
as 20-9639
Petitioner: PRATEEP BHANDARI
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Francisco Fernando-Mateo v. John Lee
as 20-3294
Interested Party: CHAD F. WOLF, BILL PRIM, ROBERT GUADIAN and others
Respondent: JOHN Z. LEE
Petitioner: FRANCISCO FERNANDO-MATEO
Mahmoud Ahmed v. William Barr
as 20-3309
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner: MAHMOUD AHMED
Jose Ponce-Osorio v. William P. Barr
as 20-3491
Respondent: William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States
Petitioner: Jose Isabel Ponce-Osorio
La Rosa Hernandez v. Barr
as 20-9638
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: ADONIS LA ROSA HERNANDEZ
Solorio Angel, et al v. Barr
as 20-9632
Petitioner: MANUEL SOLORIO ANGEL, A. SOLORIO AVILA, a minor, MARLEN AVILA OLIVOS
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Yahyaev v. Barr
as 20-9634
Petitioner: SHAVKAT YAHYAEV
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Perez-Sosa v. Rosen
as 20-2083
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, of the United States, in his official capacity and in his representative capacity for the United States, JEFFREY ROSEN, Acting Attorney General, of the United States, in his official capacity and in his representative capacity for the United States
Plaintiff / Appellant: NELSON JOSE PEREZ-SOSA
Bahena-Brito v. Barr
as 20-9631
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: ALFREDO BAHENA-BRITO
M. D. C., et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-5347
Plaintiff / Appellant: Y. O. T., D. P. R., G. G. L., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellee: William Pelham Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, James McHenry, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, Andrew Davidson, in his official capacity as USCIS Asylum Office Division Chief and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?