Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Salazar v. Stephens
as 7:2014mc01290
Petitioner: Juan Manuel Salazar
Respondent: William Stephens
Anacleto v. Bowers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00394
Petitioner: Ausencio Perez Anacleto
Respondent: Warden Rodger Bowers and William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fred Gonzales v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10454
Petitioner / Appellant: Fred Gonzales
Respondent / Appellee: William Stephens, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Dewey Evans v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10448
Petitioner - Appellant: DEWEY MACK EVANS
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
In re: William Stephens, Director, et al
as 14-40109
Petitioner: In re: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and HILDA GONZALES, sister of crime victim, David Cardenas
In re: John Quintanilla, Jr.
as 13-40750
Movant: In re: JOHN MANUEL QUINTANILLA, JR.
Respondent: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ramey v. Stephens
as 6:2013mc00003
Petitioner: Ker'sean Olajuwa Ramey
Respondent: William Stephens
Thompson v. Stephens
as 4:2013mc00738
Petitioner: Charles Victor Thompson
Respondent: William Stephens
Lush v. Internal Revenue Service. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 09-20. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.09-205
as 4:2009mc00020
Plaintiff: William Stephen Lush, II
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Lush v. Internal Revenue Service. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 09-18. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE 09cv205
as 4:2009mc00018
Plaintiff: William Stephen Lush, II
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?