Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Newman v. SL Green Realty Corp et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Joel Newman, Eric Gutman and William Wong
Defendant:
SL Green Realty Corp and Summit OVA Tenant LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Fukuda v. Wong
as 1:2019cv00661
Defendant:
Dr. William Wong, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Mark Fukuda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Hong Wong
as 14-10336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
HONG LEE WONG, AKA William Wong
USA v. Hong Wong
as 14-10276
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HONG LEE WONG, AKA William Wong
Cheery Way (USA), Inc. v. Duong et al
as 3:2012cv00486
Plaintiff:
Cheery Way (USA), Inc.
Defendant:
Ngoc Diep Duong, Thu Ha Nong, Incom Trading USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-55694
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter-defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Real-party-in-interest:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wong v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv21076
Plaintiff:
William Wong
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation , Tropical Tours and XYZ Corporation(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wong et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv01612
Plaintiff:
Carmella Wong and William Wong
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barefoot Dreams, Inc. et al v. Lotus Spring USA, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00033
Plaintiff:
Barefoot Dreams, Inc. and Annette Seifert Cook
Defendant:
Lotus Spring USA, LLC, William Wong and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
