Cases 1 - 10 of 617
KRIEGER v. McElrath Legal Holdings LLC
as 2:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G KRIEGER
Defendant:
McElrath Legal Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
KRIEGER v. MCELRATH LEGAL HOLDINGS LLC
as 2:2024mc00508
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G KRIEGER
Defendant:
MCELRATH LEGAL HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
KRIEGER v. GML LOGISTICS LLC
as 2:2024mc00437
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G KRIEGER
Defendant:
GML LOGISTICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
KRIEGER v. GML LOGISTICS LLC
as 2:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G KRIEGER
Defendant:
GML LOGISTICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Fordyce v. Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Edward Fordyce
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
STERN et al v. Ruzich et al
as 2:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
EVERETT STERN and TACTICAL RABBIT, INC.
Defendant:
William Ruzich, Lindsay Moran, Kyeson Utley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
SPENCER et al v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
MARCUS SPENCER, SCOTT CHANG, JESSICA BURGESS and others
Defendant:
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
DOYLE v. FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
as 2:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOYLE
Defendant:
FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DOYLE v. FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
as 5:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOYLE
Defendant:
FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WILLIAMS et al v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA et al
as 2:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
AHMAD WILLIAMS and KINGSON ENTERPRISE LLC
Defendant:
MERCEDES-BENZ USA and MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
