Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wood et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv08044
Plaintiff:
Mark Wood, Anthony Donisi, Gary Byington and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Adam Russell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Stone #1 et al v. Kubik et al
as 1:2021cv01191
Plaintiff:
Jane Stone #1, Jane Stone #2, Jane Stone #4 and others
Defendant:
Brian Kubik, Susan Squires, David Stupnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Banks et al
as 1:2021cv06178
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith
Defendant:
C.O. Banks, Cpt. Alexis, Cpt. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. John Doe C.O. et al
as 1:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith
Defendant:
John Doe C.O., John Doe Watch Commander, John Doe Commissioner of Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. John Doe C.O. et al
as 1:2020cv11048
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith
Defendant:
John Doe C.O., John Doe Watch Commander, John Doe Commissioner of Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Banks et al
as 1:2020cv05572
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith
Defendant:
C.O. Banks, Cpt. Smart, Cpt. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv09501
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Marget Egan, Patsy Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Allen et al
as 1:2019cv07171
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith and Willie Davis
Defendant:
Correction Officer Q Simmons and Correction Officer S Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
