Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Willing v. Hutchings, et al.
as 24-205
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JAMES WILLING
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, Substituted in place of Brian Williams, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and ADAM LAXALT
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR.
Perez-Peralta, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4406
Petitioner:
JOSE WILLS PEREZ-PERALTA, I, NANCY MARILU BARNICA LOPEZ, I and ALAYA PEREZ-BARNICA, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wills v. Bank of New York Mellon
as 23-3630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUCILLE WILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Sommer Richards v. LVMPD, et al
as 22-15745
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOMMER RICHARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and ONDRE WILLS
John Doe, et al v. Lawrence Wasden, et al
as 21-35826
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE and RANDALL MENGES
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE WASDEN, Attorney General of the State of Idaho, in his official capacity, KEDRICK WILLS, Colonel of the Idaho State Police, LELIA MCNEIL, Bureau Chief of the Idaho State Police Bureau of Criminal Investigation, in her official capacity and others
Nicholas Willing v. USDC-NVL
as 20-73257
Not Classified By Court:
ADAM LAXALT, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS JAMES WILLING
Patricia McColm v. Trinity County, et al
as 20-15646
Defendant / Appellee:
STACY WARNER, RICHARD KALUSTIAN, DAN DIAZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA A. MCCOLM
Russell Wills, et al v. City of Dupont Police Departme, et al
as 19-35983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE ERICKSON and RUSSELL R. WILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DUPONT and CITY OF DUPONT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cynthia Wills v. UPS, et al
as 19-17001
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST REPUBLIC BANK, HANSON BRIDGETT, LLP and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CYNTHIA S. WILLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
