Cases 41 - 50 of 152
PAULINO v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv02690
Petitioner:
ANTONIO PAULINO
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALDWELL v. SHEEHAN et al
as 1:2018cv01258
Plaintiff:
ODERI CALDWELL
Defendant:
DANA SHEEHAN, AL SOLANIK, LUZ TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALEEM v. BONDS et al
as 1:2018cv01159
Plaintiff:
ABDUL WALI SALEEM
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, SOUTH WOOD STATE PRISON MAIL ROOM STAFF and YUSEF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. BONDS et al
as 1:2018cv00931
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E. HAYES
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. EARLING et al
as 1:2018cv00623
Plaintiff:
PONTELL BRYANT
Defendant:
BARBARA EARLING, WILLIE BONDS and KIPPIE KANGFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASKINS et al v. TRUMP
as 2:2018cv00459
Plaintiff:
DAVID GASKINS, WILLIE LAWSON and KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. BONDS et al
as 1:2017cv13364
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E HAYES
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DABNEY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv08484
Plaintiff:
OSHA DABNEY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIE BONDS and DEPTCOR INDUSTRIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2017cv07270
Petitioner:
SOLADEEN BASS TAYLOR
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALDWELL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv06821
Plaintiff:
ODERI Y CALDWELL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIE BONDS, PETIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
