Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Thompson v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07597
Plaintiff:
Wilma Thompson
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
James Campbell Company LLC v. Heirs or Assigns of Keawe, et al.
as 1:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Campbell Company LLC
Defendant:
Heirs or Assigns of Keawe, et al., Makaluhi, L.M. Keaunui and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Campbell Company LLC v. Heirs or Assigns of Makaokalai, et al.
as 1:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
James Campbell Company LLC
Defendant:
Heirs or Assigns of Makaokalai, Makaluhi, L. M. Keaunui and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Thompson et al
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Wilma Thompson, Kymberly Parker, Ligaya Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
James Campbell Company LLC v. Makilo, Heirs or Assigns of et al
as 1:2013cv00247
Plaintiff:
James Campbell Company LLC
Defendant:
Makilo, Heirs or Assigns of, Makaluhi, Heirs or Assigns of, Kaukaha, Heirs or Assigns of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ASEA/AFSCME Local 52 Health Be, et al v. Janice Johnson
as 09-17420
:
In re: BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASEA/AFSCME LOCAL 52 HEALTH BENEFITS TRUST
Objector - Appellant:
JANICE JOHNSON and WILMA THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
