Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v LeGrand et al
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Woods
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, J. Chandler, Jim Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga v. Hartman et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Zuniga
Defendant:
Hartman, Eric Wood, Willhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wood and Jacob Woods
Defendant:
Warden Breitenbach, Omler, Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Woods
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, Erin Parks, Desiree Hultenschmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Henly et al
as 3:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jamelle L. Russell
Defendant:
Henly, Justin Zysman, Jeffery Holz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Najera et al
as 2:2023cv00991
Petitioner:
Donte Woods
Respondent:
Najera Gabricla, Attorney General State of Nevada and Gabriela Najera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Dyer et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
James E. Scott
Defendant:
Dyer, Sheriff Joe Lombardo, State of Nevada Ex Rel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Leonard R Woods
Respondent:
B. Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peak v. Wilson et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Peak
Defendant:
Jonathan Wilson, James Woods, Caseworker Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
