Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Woods v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv02087
Plaintiff:
Earl Douglas Woods
Defendant:
State of Oregon, McMinnville, OR 97128, Yamhill County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Marion County Parole and Probation
as 6:2019cv00616
Respondent:
Marion County Parole and Probation
Petitioner:
Burl Lee Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Long v. Polonsky et al
as 6:2018cv01798
Respondent:
Marion County Corrections, Jeff Wood and Sophie P. Polonsky
Petitioner:
David Benjamin Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. SAIF Corporation et al
as 6:2016cv00380
Defendant:
Jane and John Does 1-10, Allen George, Cameron Larabee and others
Plaintiff:
Burl Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Nelson et al
as 6:2016cv00232
Defendant:
Deputy Barkhurst, Deputy Brown, Lt. Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Darren James Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods et al v. Staton et al
as 3:2015cv02169
Defendant:
Judge Eric Bergstrom, Chaplan Kyle and Sheriff D. Staton
Plaintiff:
Clifford Lucas and Laurence Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Hascall et al
as 2:2015cv02098
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Cathy Bryant-Kaae, Timothy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Woods et al
as 6:2015cv01336
Respondent:
Marissa Foster and Jeff Woods
Petitioner:
Teresa Lea Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Meadows et al
as 6:2015cv00954
Defendant:
Lydick and Meadows
Plaintiff:
Burl Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00102
Defendant:
Larry Bennett, Nichole Brown, Greg Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Shereen McKenzie and Lance Conway Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
