Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Dickerson v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as TXS/4:12-cv-00935
Plaintiff:
Anne Dickerson
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Denise Calzada v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as CAC/2:12-cv-02699
Plaintiff:
Denise Calzada
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc, Wright Medical Group Inc and Does
Cox et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as MSS/3:12-cv-00199
Plaintiff:
Billy Eugene Cox and Celia E. Cox
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group Inc.
Thomas v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as ARE/4:12-cv-00174
Plaintiff:
Leon Thomas
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc and Wright Medical Group Inc
Nail v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as ALN/4:12-cv-00857
Plaintiff:
Rita Nail
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Poling v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as WVN/2:12-cv-00022
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Poling
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Wilkinson et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as OHS/2:12-cv-00201
Plaintiff:
Craig Steven Wilkinson and Genevieve Erin Wilkinson
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Baker et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as GAN/1:12-cv-00598
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Baker and Mary Baker
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
PATENT COMPLIANCE V WRIGHT MEDICAL
as 11-1176
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Patent Compliance Group, Inc.
Defendant-Appellee:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS v. WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHN
as 2:2000cv01167
Plaintiff:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Defendant:
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Counter_claimant:
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
