Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WYNN
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEPHEN A WYNN and STEPHEN A. WYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
TRUDEL v. DILMORE et al
as 1:2021cv03162
Defendant:
HUGH DAVID O'DONNELL, WYNN ANDREW HARDING, PHYLLIS ARMATROUT WONG and others
Plaintiff:
MARY TRUDEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WYNN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00230
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
DAISY WYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WYNN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv02688
Plaintiff:
ROBIN WYNN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPBELL et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CAMPBELL, JR. and KISHA CAMPBELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DWAYNE FOSTER, REGINALD BALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02352
Plaintiff:
RADCLIFFE BANCROFT LEWIS
Defendant:
WALTER S. PANKOWSKI , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WYNN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2016cv02183
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WYNN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
PATEL v. WYNNE
as 1:2016mc00470
Plaintiff:
KANTI B. PATEL
Defendant:
JAMES T. WYNNE, JR.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
