Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Adams v. XTO Energy, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Lloyd A. Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
XTO Energy, Inc. v. Whitmire, et al
as 6:2016cv00138
Plaintiff:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Defendant:
Ray Whitmire and Lainie Whitmire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 14-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM REECE, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, DIANE REECE, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, HERMAN TOLBERT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, AES SHADY POINT, a Delaware Corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Dixon et al v. XTO Energy, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00349
Plaintiff:
Franklin Dixon , Kathy Dixon , Jimmy Walker and others
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc. , Elvin Sweeten , Flora Sweeten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Swan & Matheson Resources LLC et al v. XTO Energy Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
Swan & Matheson Resources LLC , Sheldon Swan and Krishel Resources Inc
Defendant:
XTO Energy Inc and Canyon Partners LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Reece et al v. AES Corporation et al
as 6:2012cv00457
Defendant:
Star Bulk, MMHF, LLC, SEECO, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Reece, Bennett Tanksley, Charles Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shuman et al v. XTO Energy, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mellanie J. Shuman and Mellanie J. Shuman
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
XTO Energy, Inc. v. Amburn
as 1:2007cv00795
Plaintiff:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Defendant:
Opal I. Amburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
