Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
U.S. Anesthesia Prts TX v. HHS
as 24-10384
Plaintiff: U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Florida, Incorporated, U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Colorado, Incorporated and others
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
TX Medical Assoc v. HHS
as 23-40605
Plaintiff / Appellee: Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, L.L.C., Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, United States Department of Labor and others
Reliance Behavioral Health, P.C. v. Becerra
as 5:2023cv01151
Plaintiff: Reliance Behavioral Health, P.C.
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 23-10564
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas and Lubbock Independent School District
Defendant / Appellant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Jooyuen Chang, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary and others
Texas Medical Association v. HHS
as 23-40217
Plaintiff / Appellee: Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, L.L.C., Doctor Adam Corley and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
R J Reynolds Tobacco v. FDA
as 23-40076
Plaintiff / Appellee: R J Reynolds Tobacco Company, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Incorporated, ITG Brands LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Stephen M. Hahn, Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
State of Texas v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff: State of Texas
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Midland Odessa, LLC v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00237
Plaintiff: Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Midland Odessa, LLC
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BCFS Hlth and Human Svcs v. LABR
as 22-50361
Plaintiff / Appellant: BCFS Health and Human Services
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Labor, Marty J. Walsh, Secretary, Jessica Looman, Acting Administrator Wage and Hour Division, in her official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?