Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Xavier Elizondo
as 20-2167
Defendant / Appellant:
XAVIER ELIZONDO, also known as "X"
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Soto v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv01805
Plaintiff:
Soto and David Soto
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer Xavier Elizondo, Rocco Pruger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simmons v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv00478
Defendant:
Officer Arnoldo Luevano, City of Chicago, Officer Xavier Elizondo and others
Plaintiff:
Irene Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv00250
Defendant:
Richard Mostowski, Michael Karczewski, J.A. McClain and others
Plaintiff:
A.C. (minor child), Cruz Dontay, Micaela Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado et al v. Elizondo et al
as 1:2019cv03521
Plaintiff:
Diane Castillo and Ricardo Maldonado
Defendant:
J. D. Caribou, J. J. Barrios, Xavier Elizondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treadwell v. Salgado et al
as 1:2019cv03179
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David Salgado and Xavier Elizondo
Plaintiff:
Mark Treadwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Police Officer David Salgado, Star No. 16347 et al
as 1:2019cv00475
Plaintiff:
Ali Knox
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Police Officer David Salgado, Star No. 16347, Sergeant Xavier Elizondo, Star No. 1340 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv06456
Defendant:
Michael Stutz, Vincent Ciocci, Mark Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Cornell Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv04379
Plaintiff:
Raul Robles
Defendant:
City of Chicago , David Salgado, Xavier Elizondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boldon v. Salgado et al
as 1:2018cv04233
Plaintiff:
Devonte Boldon
Defendant:
David L Salgado, Rocco Pruger, Xavier Elizondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
